Progressive Christianity: Where It Diverges, Where Its Critiques Are Valid, and What to Hold Onto

Progressive Christianity is not a denomination or an institution — it is a theological and cultural orientation that has emerged primarily within formerly evangelical or mainline Protestant contexts. It is characterized by openness to biblical reinterpretation, affirmation of LGBTQ inclusion, emphasis on social justice, skepticism about doctrinal certainty, and prioritization of Jesus's ethical teachings over traditional atonement theology.

It is also — and this needs to be said carefully and charitably — a movement that sometimes diverges from historic Christian teaching in ways that are not merely stylistic or cultural but substantive.

A careful assessment requires both taking its valid critiques seriously and being honest about where it loses the thread.

What Progressive Christianity Gets Right

1. The prophetic critique of cultural Christianity.

Progressive Christianity has been correct to identify and critique the ways American evangelicalism has become entangled with cultural and political power in ways that distort its witness. The alignment of much of evangelical Christianity with a specific political party, the accommodation of racism through much of the 20th century, the failure to adequately address abuse within church structures, the prosperity gospel's accommodation of wealth — these are genuine failures that deserve prophetic critique.

When Rachel Held Evans (a leading progressive Christian voice before her death in 2019) critiqued the double standards applied to women's leadership, the treatment of LGBTQ people, and the church's relationship with political power, many of her critiques were theologically grounded and important.

2. The emphasis on the ethics of Jesus.

Progressive Christianity's recovery of the Sermon on the Mount, the Year of Jubilee, the Magnificat, and Jesus's consistent concern for the poor, the marginalized, and the excluded is correct and important. The prophetic tradition's insistence that justice and mercy are not optional additions to faith but central to it — "he has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God" (Micah 6:8) — has been under-emphasized in much evangelical culture.

3. The critique of simplistic biblical inerrancy.

The recognition that the Bible is a complex, human, historically conditioned document that requires careful interpretation — that "the Bible says it, I believe it, that settles it" doesn't account for the genuine interpretive work required to understand any text — is a correction worth making. The history of biblical scholarship, including evangelical scholarship, has consistently shown that careful attention to historical context, genre, and original language changes how texts are read.

4. The emphasis on relationship over performance.

Progressive Christianity's critique of moralism — the reduction of Christianity to a set of behavioral requirements that produce external conformity without internal transformation — is a genuinely biblical critique. Jesus's most consistent opposition was to the Pharisees, whose problem was precisely this: external religious performance without internal transformation.

Where Progressive Christianity Diverges

1. The tendency to reduce Jesus to an ethical teacher.

Progressive Christianity often presents Jesus primarily as a moral teacher — the greatest example of love, justice, and inclusion — rather than as the incarnate God who died for sin and rose from the dead. When the resurrection becomes optional, or is reinterpreted as a metaphor for the hope that love conquers death, the specifically Christian claim — that a specific man rose bodily from a specific tomb — has been abandoned.

This is not a minor adjustment. Paul is explicit: "If Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins" (1 Corinthians 15:17). The resurrection is not a dispensable element of the gospel — it is the gospel's center.

2. The tendency toward cultural accommodation rather than prophetic engagement.

Progressive Christianity began as a critique of evangelical culture's accommodation to political power. It has, in many expressions, ended up equally accommodated to a different cultural power: contemporary progressive secular culture. When the conclusions of "honest biblical inquiry" consistently align with the positions already held by the cultural left, it's worth asking whether the inquiry was as independent as advertised.

To be fair, this is a critique that applies to all theologically situated Christianity — we all read Scripture through cultural lenses. But the self-awareness about this is often greater in progressive circles than the willingness to ask whether the accommodation runs both ways.

3. The deconstruction of doctrinal content.

Historic Christianity has maintained doctrinal content that is not merely cultural but substantive: the Trinity, the incarnation, the bodily resurrection, the atonement, the return of Christ. Progressive Christianity sometimes dismisses doctrinal precision as "tribalism" or "boundary-marking" without acknowledging that doctrinal content is what distinguishes Christianity from generic spirituality. A faith without doctrinal content eventually becomes a spiritual practice indistinguishable from secular therapeutic culture.

4. The handling of biblical authority.

Progressive Christianity often begins with a legitimate observation (the Bible requires interpretation; the interpretive tradition has sometimes been wrong) and arrives at a position where individual experience or contemporary cultural consensus becomes the de facto authority over Scripture. The result is that difficult or counter-cultural passages (on sexuality, on judgment, on the exclusivity of Christ) are reinterpreted away, while the culturally compatible passages are affirmed without the same critical scrutiny.

5. The exclusivity question.

Jesus's "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me" (John 14:6) and the apostolic proclamation that "there is no other name under heaven given to mankind by which we must be saved" (Acts 4:12) are texts that progressive Christianity often handles by reinterpretation or silence. The question of whether Jesus is the uniquely necessary path to salvation is not a peripheral question — it is central to the entire missionary impulse of the New Testament.

This doesn't mean Christians should be cruel about this claim, or use it as a weapon, or stop listening to the genuine questions it raises. But a Christianity that has abandoned it has abandoned something Paul considered the core of the gospel.

What to Hold Onto

The honest response to progressive Christianity's valid critiques is not to reject them but to hold them while also holding onto the historic content that makes Christianity what it is rather than something else.

• Hold the prophetic critique of cultural Christianity and the historic content of the gospel
• Hold the centrality of Jesus's ethics and the centrality of his atoning death and bodily resurrection
• Hold the complexity of biblical interpretation and the Bible's authority as the norming norm
• Hold genuine humility about doctrinal claims and the recognition that some things are not negotiable without losing Christian identity
• Hold love and welcome for LGBTQ people and honest engagement with what the tradition has consistently taught about sexuality

This is not easy. It doesn't produce neat categories or clean tribal identities. It requires the willingness to be criticized from both sides — which is often where theological fidelity lives.

A Prayer for Those Navigating Between Traditions

Lord, I am trying to hold things that seem to want to pull apart. The gospel as I've received it and the questions I can no longer avoid. The tradition I was formed in and the critiques of it that I can't dismiss. The community I came from and the community I might be moving toward.

Give me the discernment to know what to hold and what to release. Help me to critique without abandoning, to deconstruct without destroying what matters. And help me to return, always, to You — the Jesus of the Gospels, who is harder to domesticate than any of our cultural versions.

Amen.

Testimonio engages honestly with the complexity of contemporary Christianity. Download the app for meditations that take both faith and questions seriously.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is progressive Christianity a legitimate expression of Christianity? This depends on what you mean by "progressive Christianity." There is a wide spectrum: some expressions maintain historic Christian doctrine while emphasizing social ethics and welcoming marginalized people — this is clearly within the tradition. Other expressions have abandoned the bodily resurrection, the uniqueness of Christ, or the authority of Scripture in ways that depart from what the tradition has consistently recognized as Christian. The assessment depends on which expression is in view.

Can I engage with progressive Christian voices without losing my faith? Yes — in fact, engagement with serious challenges to faith tends to produce more robust faith than avoidance. Reading Rachel Held Evans, Rob Bell, or Richard Rohr alongside theologians like N.T. Wright, Tim Keller, or Karl Barth is more faith-forming than reading only from within a single tradition. The key is reading critically, with theological tools for discernment.

Is there a version of orthodoxy that addresses progressive Christianity's valid critiques? Yes. Theologians like Willie Jennings, Miroslav Volf, Scot McKnight, and N.T. Wright maintain historic Christian theology while engaging seriously with questions of justice, inclusion, and cultural critique. Denominational movements like the Reformed Church in America, parts of the Anglican tradition, and various ecumenical communities are also working in this space.